Myths and Legends in the Franklin Expedition Journals

In the autumn of 1833, as George Back’s party ascended the Thlew-ee-choh (Back River), they passed a conical rock rising from the tundra. Their Dene guide pointed to it and called it the “Beaver’s Lodge.” Then, with solemn gravity, he warned: “Lucky shall we be if we are not visited with a gale of wind, or something worse.” He recounted an ancient feud between the beaver and the muskrat, a tale of pride, rivalry, and supernatural retribution.

The British officers recorded the story as a curious “traditionary tale.” But in that moment, they were preserving one of the oldest forms of human knowledge, oral tradition, from a world on the cusp of irrevocable change.

Stories of Origin and Migration

Among the Dog-Rib (Tłı̨chǫ), Franklin heard a story during the first expedition (1820) that would resonate with his evangelical fervour — their ancestors once lived in a western land “where there was no winter,” filled with “large fruits now unknown.” Into this paradise came “a man who healed the sick, raised the dead, and performed many other miracles,” urging the people to live justly. When he departed, a great cold descended, forcing the people eastward into the harsh country they now inhabited.

Similarly, the Slavey and Yellowknives recounted a dramatic historical legend: for a generation, the Yellowknife had enslaved and terrorized the Slavey people. But one season, the Slavey rose up “partly by treachery and partly by valour,” and “annihilated the boasted ascendancy of their tyrants.” Back, writing in 1834, noted that this uprising explained why Akaitcho’s authority had waned. The story served as a moral: oppression begets rebellion.

The Spirit World and Taboo

For the Inuit, the Arctic landscape was alive with spirits. The sea ice had agency; the aurora borealis was the spirits of the dead playing ball with a walrus skull. Whistling at it, they warned, could cause it to descend and decapitate the whistler. These beliefs were not superstition, but a sophisticated system of environmental ethics.

During the “Starvation October” of 1821, the journals preserve haunting echoes of the Windigo, though never by name. After voyageur Michel Terohaute was found secretly butchering the body of a dead comrade, Dr. Richardson executed him. The officers framed this as justice against a depraved murderer. But the pattern — solitary hunting, secretive behavior, consumption of human flesh during famine — aligns precisely with Windigo narratives. Richardson’s act was not just punishment; it was a ritual destruction of a spiritual contagion.

Ecological Wisdom in Mythic Form

Many “superstitions” were encoded ecological knowledge. Near Great Bear Lake, Franklin was told that if a solitary deer were beaten, the entire herd would abandon that part of the country — “as if thousands of animals could hear the cry of one.” He dismissed this as “Indian inconsistency.” But the belief served as a conservation ethic: killing a lone deer (often a scout) would spook the herd, making future hunting impossible.

Likewise, the Beaver’s Lodge legend recorded by Back in 1834 wasn’t just a moral fable — it was a navigational warning. The rock marked a stretch of river prone to sudden storms. The story encoded practical knowledge in a memorable form, ensuring its transmission across generations.

Why These Stories Matter

The Franklin officers never fully grasped the depth of what they were hearing. They recorded myths as curiosities, legends as historical oddities. Yet, precisely because they wrote so meticulously — often quoting their informants verbatim — they preserved voices that might otherwise have been lost.

Today, these fragments are more than historical artifacts. They are literary treasures for Indigenous communities working to reclaim languages, traditions, and worldviews disrupted by colonization. They remind us that the Arctic was never an empty wilderness, but a homeland rich with story, meaning, and law.

In an age of climate crisis, these old stories take on new urgency. They speak of a world where humans are not masters of nature, but participants in a web of reciprocal relationships — with animals, ice, rivers, and spirits. To listen to them is not just an act of historical recovery, but a step toward a more humble and sustainable future.